All industries

Manufacturing & supply chain
from plant signal to operating decision.

Operational chart scenarios for plant, quality, procurement, logistics, and supply-chain teams managing flow and variability.

Not a generic chart request.

Industrial data is most valuable when it connects a line, supplier, or process stage to a near-term operating action. Good scenarios preserve the shift, product mix, time window, and definition behind every KPI.

  1. 01
    Daily production meeting on line effectivenessPlant operations manager
  2. 02
    Supplier recovery after corrective actionStrategic sourcing manager
  3. 03
    Distribution-network flow before peak seasonSupply-chain network planner

Daily production meeting on line effectiveness

Trigger

Output missed plan for three days even though scheduled labor and demand remained stable.

Business question

Is the loss driven by availability, speed, or quality—and on which line?

Source data

MES runtime, ideal cycle rate, and accepted-unit counts calculated under one OEE definition.

Decision

Prioritize changeover reliability on Line C before adding overtime or increasing the production plan.

Deliverable

An OEE comparison for the morning tier meeting and a final frame on the continuous-improvement board.

OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS · PRIOR DAY

Line C is the constraint

Line A82%
Line B77%
Line C54%
Line D73%
Line E79%
LIVELYCHARTPLAY THE NUMBERS
What the chart should make obvious

Line C sits more than 20 points below the plant cluster, making it the first diagnostic target before a labor-capacity response.

  • Use one OEE definition
  • Show the planned threshold in discussion
  • Drill into availability, speed, and quality next
Build with Horizontal Percent Bars
View the exact example data
Line,OEE
Line A,82
Line B,77
Line C,54
Line D,73
Line E,79

Synthetic example data for demonstrating the workflow. Replace it with approved source data before publishing.

Supplier recovery after corrective action

Trigger

Three suppliers completed a 90-day corrective-action plan after repeated material delays.

Business question

Which suppliers reduced lead time enough to restore standard safety-stock policy?

Source data

Purchase-order creation to accepted receipt, measured in calendar days and segmented by comparable material family.

Decision

Restore normal allocation for two suppliers and maintain contingency stock for the supplier that remains unstable.

Deliverable

A before/after chart for the supplier review and sourcing recommendation.

MEDIAN PURCHASE-ORDER LEAD TIME · DAYS

Two suppliers recovered; one remains exposed

Atlas Components3422Nova Materials4125Vertex Metals3735Harbor Plastics2924
Before actionAfter action
LIVELYCHARTPLAY THE NUMBERS
What the chart should make obvious

Vertex reduced median lead time by only two days while peers improved materially, supporting continued contingency inventory for its material family.

  • Compare like material families
  • Use median to reduce outlier distortion
  • Pair speed with defect and fill-rate checks
Build with Dumbbell Delta
View the exact example data
Supplier,Before action,After action
Atlas Components,34,22
Nova Materials,41,25
Vertex Metals,37,35
Harbor Plastics,29,24

Synthetic example data for demonstrating the workflow. Replace it with approved source data before publishing.

Distribution-network flow before peak season

Trigger

Peak forecast exceeds one distribution center’s planned throughput and alternative routing must be agreed before carrier commitments.

Business question

Where can regional order volume be rerouted without overloading downstream fulfillment nodes?

Source data

Forecast order units by origin region, distribution center, and destination zone under the peak planning scenario.

Decision

Move part of the East flow from DC1 to DC3 and reserve additional carrier capacity on the affected lane.

Deliverable

A Sankey animation for the peak-readiness workshop and a static flow map in the capacity plan.

FORECAST WEEKLY ORDER FLOW · 000 UNITS

East demand overloads DC1

East → DC1: 82East → DC3: 28Central → DC2: 61Central → DC3: 34West → DC3: 69DC1 → Metro: 52DC1 → Coastal: 30DC2 → Metro: 35DC2 → South: 26DC3 → Coastal: 48DC3 → South: 83East110DC182DC3131Central95DC261West69Metro87Coastal78South109
LIVELYCHARTPLAY THE NUMBERS
What the chart should make obvious

East sends 82 thousand weekly units through DC1 while DC3 retains alternative routing capacity, making the East-to-DC3 lane the practical balancing lever.

  • Keep units consistent
  • Avoid cycles in the flow table
  • Validate capacity outside the chart before committing
Build with Sankey Flow
View the exact example data
Source,Target,Value
East,DC1,82
East,DC3,28
Central,DC2,61
Central,DC3,34
West,DC3,69
DC1,Metro,52
DC1,Coastal,30
DC2,Metro,35
DC2,South,26
DC3,Coastal,48
DC3,South,83

Synthetic example data for demonstrating the workflow. Replace it with approved source data before publishing.

Turn the scenario into your chart

Use the example dataset to test the visual structure, then replace it with approved data from the named source system and validate the decision context before export.

Before you publish

Which manufacturing KPIs should be animated?

Use animation when sequence matters: shift-by-shift ranking, flow between process stages, before/after corrective action, or quality and downtime trends around a known intervention.

How do I compare plants fairly?

Normalize product mix, planned time, KPI definition, shift window, and exclusions before ranking plants or lines.

Ready to make
your data move?

Open the studio